A lawsuit has been filed against Roku and TCL North America alleging that certain smart TVs were rendered partially or completely unusable after software updates. According to the complaint, consumers purchased these televisions expecting reliable performance, but later experienced serious malfunctions tied to system updates.
Plaintiffs claim the updates caused widespread issues, including black screens, repeated crashes, freezing, and total loss of functionality—a condition often described as “bricking.” The lawsuit alleges that these defects significantly impaired the usability of the devices, leaving some consumers with TVs that no longer function as intended.
The complaint further argues that Roku and TCL failed to properly test updates before releasing them and did not adequately disclose the risks associated with automatic software updates. Plaintiffs also allege that despite ongoing complaints, the companies failed to provide effective fixes, repairs, or compensation, even though warranties suggested issues would be addressed.
The lawsuit seeks to represent a class of consumers who purchased Roku-powered TCL smart TVs and experienced performance failures following updates. Plaintiffs are pursuing damages, repairs or replacements, and changes to how software updates are tested, deployed, and disclosed.
Because the allegations involve widely distributed consumer electronics and claims that software updates rendered devices unusable, a class action lawsuit may follow or expand as more consumers become aware of the issue.
Take advantage of our free claim filing service today, as you may qualify for compensation. Payments may be increased or decreased on a pro rata basis.
The information provided on this website does not, and is not intended to, constitute legal advice; instead, all information, content, and materials available on this site are for general informational purposes only. Information on this website may not constitute the most up-to-date legal or other information. This website contains links to other third-party websites. Such links are only for the convenience of the reader, user or browser; the ABA and its members do not recommend or endorse the contents of the third-party sites. Readers of this website should contact their attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular legal matter. No reader, user, or browser of this site should act or refrain from acting on the basis of information on this site without first seeking legal advice from counsel in the relevant jurisdiction. Only your individual attorney can provide assurances that the information contained herein – and your interpretation of it – is applicable or appropriate to your particular situation.
Use of, and access to, this website or any of the links or resources contained within the site do not create an attorney-client relationship between the reader, user, or browser and website authors, contributors, contributing law firms, or committee members and their respective employers. Settlement Research Inc. is not a law firm and does not directly provide legal advice. We do not recommend or endorse any attorneys that pay to participate. The views expressed at, or through, this site are those of the individual authors writing in their individual capacities only – not those of their respective employers, the ABA, or committee/task force as a whole. All liability with respect to actions taken or not taken based on the contents of this site are hereby expressly disclaimed. Form submission does not guarantee compensation. The content on this posting is provided “as is;” no representations are made that the content is error-free.