A lawsuit has been filed against Driscoll’s alleging that its strawberries contain per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), commonly referred to as “forever chemicals.” According to the complaint, Driscoll’s promotes its strawberries as being produced with rigorous food safety and quality standards, yet independent testing reportedly found PFAS compounds in the fruit.
The lawsuit claims that independent laboratory tests identified multiple pesticide residues on Driscoll’s strawberries, including those linked to PFAS chemistry. These findings were highlighted in a report by Mamavation in May 2026. Plaintiffs argue that Driscoll’s marketing, which emphasizes safety, quality, and purity, misleads consumers into believing the strawberries are free from such chemicals.
Plaintiffs assert that consumers were harmed by paying a premium for strawberries they believed were safe and free from harmful chemicals. They argue that Driscoll’s extensive marketing campaigns, which portray the brand as environmentally friendly, further misled consumers about the true nature of its farming practices.
The complaint seeks to represent a class of consumers who purchased Driscoll’s strawberries for personal, family, or household use. Plaintiffs are requesting declaratory and injunctive relief, as well as punitive damages, claiming violations of California’s Environmental Marketing Claims Act, Unfair Competition Law, False Advertising Law, and Consumers Legal Remedies Act.
Take advantage of our free claim filing service today, as you may qualify for compensation. Payments may be increased or decreased on a pro rata basis.
The information provided on this website does not, and is not intended to, constitute legal advice; instead, all information, content, and materials available on this site are for general informational purposes only. Information on this website may not constitute the most up-to-date legal or other information. This website contains links to other third-party websites. Such links are only for the convenience of the reader, user or browser; the ABA and its members do not recommend or endorse the contents of the third-party sites. Readers of this website should contact their attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular legal matter. No reader, user, or browser of this site should act or refrain from acting on the basis of information on this site without first seeking legal advice from counsel in the relevant jurisdiction. Only your individual attorney can provide assurances that the information contained herein – and your interpretation of it – is applicable or appropriate to your particular situation.
Use of, and access to, this website or any of the links or resources contained within the site do not create an attorney-client relationship between the reader, user, or browser and website authors, contributors, contributing law firms, or committee members and their respective employers. Settlement Research Inc. is not a law firm and does not directly provide legal advice. We do not recommend or endorse any attorneys that pay to participate. The views expressed at, or through, this site are those of the individual authors writing in their individual capacities only – not those of their respective employers, the ABA, or committee/task force as a whole. All liability with respect to actions taken or not taken based on the contents of this site are hereby expressly disclaimed. Form submission does not guarantee compensation. The content on this posting is provided “as is;” no representations are made that the content is error-free.